Prigg v. pennsylvania decided that:

question 13 options:

a. congress does not have the power to prohibit discrimination in public accommodations.

b. involved segregation of railroad cars.

c. held that federal law controls over state law to the contrary.

d. slaves could own property as long as the property was located in a non-slave state.

C. Held that federal law controls over state law to the contrary.

Explanation:

Edward Prigg was a slave catcher who abducted Margaret Morgan and her children . Morgan had once been a slave owned by the Ashmore family in Maryland. Pennsylvania then charged and convicted Prigg for violating the anti-kidnapping laws. Then the United States Supreme Court precluded a Pennsylvania state law that prohibited blacks from being taken out of the free state of Pennsylvania into slavery.

Reference: Dugger, Ashley. “Prigg v. Pennsylvania: Summary"; Analysis Video.” Study.com, Study.com, 2019,

idk lol i just wanna finish mines

we need the answer choices to answer the question