What are two ways the bill of rights opposes the idea of the divine right of kings? a. it established that religion had no relevance to the monarch's role. b.it states that the english monarchy was a position that parliament delegated. c. it stated that the monarch's power was subject to limits set by parliament. d.it established that the people of england has the right to choose the monarch. e.it abolished the role of the monarch as the head of the church of england.

The correct answers are A) It established that religion had no relevance to the monarch's role and C) It stated that the monarch's power was subject to limits set by parliament.

Two ways the bill of rights opposes the idea of the divine right of kings are: "It established that religion had no relevance to the monarch's role and it stated that the monarch's power was subject to limits set by parliament."

We are referring to the British Bill of Rights of December 1689. The English Parliament defined a set of civil rights. William III (de Orange) and Mary II signed the Bill of Rights after they overthrew King James II in the Glorious Revolution. This Bill of Rights gave British Parliament authority over the crown.

tell him great job!

explanation:

2 is armenia i think