Edwards v. South Carolina protected people's right to assemble and
attempt to stop something from being printed.
display unpopular views in a disruptive way.
express unpopular views in a peaceful way.
protest against something on private property.
Answer 1: The protestors supported an unpopular view.
Edwards v. South Carolina was a case in which the Supreme Court held that state government officials are not allowed to force a crowd to disperse if they are otherwise legally marching in front of a state house. The decision was based on the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the US Constitution. The Supreme Court argued that the arrests were an attempt to make criminal the peaceful expression of unpopular views, and therefore an infringement on the marchers’ right of free speech, free assembly and freedom to petition for a redress of grievances.
Answer 2: The speech must present a clear and identifiable danger.
A prior restraint is an official restriction of speech prior to its publication. They are extremely serious, as they are a violation of First Amendment rights. Therefore, they are used with caution. Judges need to use the “clear and present danger” test before resorting to a prior restraint. The “gravity of the evil,” discounted by its improbability, must justify the invasion of free speech.
Answer 3: Government censorship is almost always unconstitutional.
New York Times Co. v. United States was a decision by the Supreme Court that made it possible for the New York Times and the Washington Post to publish the Pentagon Papers without government censorship.
President Nixon had tried to stop the publication, arguing that the Papers constituted classified information. The Court stated that “any system of prior restraints of expression comes to this Court bearing a heavy presumption against its constitutional validity.” In other words, it is assumed that any attempt by the government to censor the media is unconstitutional. In order to change the Court’s opinion, there must be significant proof that the expression of the material would cause irreparable damage and represent a grave danger to the American public. The burden of proof is heavy, and it was not met by the Nixon administration.
The answer is; A. The protesters supported an unpopular view.
The correct answer is that protesters supported an unpopular view.
This case of Edward V. Carolina where the supreme court which held the amendments from first to fourteenth which forbaded the government state officials to force those crowds which were matching legally to the front side of the statehouse.
Supreme court arrested, punished, and convicted petitioners who were infringed the free right of petitioners freedom of petition and free assembly.
The supreme court then said that the rights are protected by fourteenth amendments and guaranteed by first amendment by the states
The most prompted reason for the arrest of the protestors in the case of Edward versus South Carolina was that the protestors had an unpopular view which they supported very strongly.
It was this case in which Supreme Court had upheld the amendments of the United States constitution in regard to the protestors march or rebel or gathering.
It focused on the civil rights that the protestors when March towards the state house can be forced to disperse by the officials of the state government. These were sought under the first and the 14th amendments. 187 students who were black were arrested on account of breach of peace of court.
Took the test.