An opportunity cost is the loss of possible gain from other alternatives when one is chosen, a trade-off is the course of action given up to perform the preferred plan of action (or campaign or attack).
the opportunity cost is the most desirable trade-off
A trade off is the reasoning that we are loosing something else whenever we choose something, for example if you decide to eat a sub for lunch, you loose the opportunity of having pizza for lunch, the opportunity cost is when from the trade off you get the best option possible, like winning the trade off. That is why the correct option would be: the opportunity cost is the most desirable trade-off
The opportunity cost is the most desirable trade-off.
Explanation: Trade-offs refer to the choosing decisions that an individual faces when choosing between two-goods or making any other economic decision. For instance, a graduate may face a trade-off between choosing a job or starting up his own business.
While, opportunity cost is simply the cost of the lost alternative. For example, if the graduate chooses to start a business then his opportunity cost is the salary foregone from going for a job.
Thus, when deciding on which option to choose (trade-off) we always look at the option which has a lower opportunity cost. So we can say that they are the most desirable trade-offs.
The opportunity cost or alternative cost designates the cost of investing the available resources at the expense of the best alternative investment available, or also the value of the best option not made. The opportunity cost of an investment is the value discarded due to the realization of the same or also the cost of not realizing the investment. It is measured by the expected profitability of the funds invested in the project (or the allocation of the immobilization to other utilities, for example, the rent of a land that we have at our disposal or, for example, the dedication of these funds to the purchase of guaranteed public debt, yield and collection). This criterion is one of those used in investment elections. In principle, the return is at least equal to the opportunity cost.