William sumner and andrew carnegie differ from each other in what way?

Sumner's position on imbalance contrasts from that of Andrew Carnegie, who trusted it was the duty of the rich to appropriate their abundance riches for the benefit of society.

What's more, Carnegie trusted that disparity was an inescapable result of social advancement outside human ability to control.

Sumner was a supporter of the hypotheses of Social Darwinism and was a solid defender of free enterprise private enterprise.

the correct answer is: the fact that the anti-federalist papers were considered poorly written.

what do you mean