subject
History, 19.09.2019 14:30 hinacat87

During the 1925 scopes trial, the defense’s main argument was that
scopes was being discriminated against.
scopes had done nothing illegal.
evolution was the latest scientific fad.
evolution was scientific fact.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 19:40
Who were some of the first people to use prostheses?
Answers: 3
question
History, 21.06.2019 21:00
What is zinn's approach to the study of history? what does he suggest occurs when history is told is the story of human progress?
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 00:20
By the late 1930s, how were u.s. officials beginning to view japanese policies of expansion? a. they attempted to join forces with japan so as to increase u.s. territory. b. they warned them to stop expansionist actions or face potential u.s. intervention. c. they sent representatives to japan to work out territorial rights in a diplomatic fashion. d. they became fearful of their military power
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 08:30
A. identify the constitutional clause that is common to both mccutcheon v. federal election commission (2014) and citizens united v. federal election commission (2010). based on the constitutional clause identified in part a, explain why the facts of citizens united v. federal election commission (2010) led to a similar holding to the holding in mccutcheon v. federal election commission (2014). describe an action that members of the public who disagree with the holding in mccutcheon v. federal election commission could take to limit its impact.
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
During the 1925 scopes trial, the defense’s main argument was that
scopes was being discrimina...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 30.10.2020 17:00
question
Mathematics, 30.10.2020 17:00
question
English, 30.10.2020 17:00
question
History, 30.10.2020 17:00
question
History, 30.10.2020 17:00
question
History, 30.10.2020 17:00
Questions on the website: 13722360