Brainliest i need writing an argument . do you defend or reject the following statement: “world war ii was a continuation of world war i.” outline for the argument: -three to five paragraphs (introduction, body paragraphs, counterclaim paragraph, conclusion) -an introduction that introduces the topic, explains why it is important, and states your thesis/claim (world war ii was a continuation of world war i or world war ii was not a continuation of world war i) -logical arguments that support your thesis/claim -evidence to support each argument -a counterclaim and evidence to support the counterclaim -explanation regarding how the evidence supporting the thesis/claim is stronger than the evidence supporting the counterclaim

answer; i believe the correct answer is (favorable balance);

he is known for discovering   the fossil of a female hominin australopithecine   known as "lucy" in the afar triangle region of hadar, ethiopia.

hope this !

have a great day!

president carter called the victims of kidnapping "victims of terrorism and anarchy" and added that the united states was not going to give in to blackmail. in the united states, they see hostage-taking as an outrage on the part of the islamist movement that violated the principle of international law on the immunity and inviolability of diplomats and their embassies.

carter refused to yield to the demands, khomeini used the situation to consolidate his power and nullify the challenges of the moderate wing of his government, headed by its president. the euphoria over the humiliation of the most powerful nation distracted the iranian people from the economic difficulties of their country. carter, in april 1980, broke diplomatic relations with iran and imposed a trade embargo, except medicine and food. iranian funds in the us they were frozen and accounted for to compensate the hostages when they were released and to pay the demands of us companies against iran.

with the political divide on multiple issues we are headed that way but one of the biggest issues that has texas involved is that democrats believe that only and form of officer or military member can posses a firearm and if they ever end up repealing the right to bear arms i am sure that most people in the lower southern states would choose to seceed in order to keep thier firearms and even fight for them. this is my opinion it does in no way, shape, form, or fashion represent everyone in the lower southern states nor am i implying thst only the southern states want to keep there firearms.