In august of 1945, the united states dropped two atomic bombs on japan to end the war. president truman agonized over the decision because it would mean massive amounts of life lost.

1. what arguments could be made for using atomic bombs to end the war?
2. what arguments could be made against using atomic weapons in the war?

1.President Truman decided to drop the bomb down because He knew that invading Japan was not an easy task due to the geographic situation of it and the american army was to weary after four years of fighting, even with americans in control of the main cities in Japan, japanese soldiers denied to give up, so the Truman saw the throwing of the bombs as one solution to end the war once and for all. .

A valid argument for the using of atomic bombs would be,  for protecting the life of american soldier and to show Japan that for them the best solutions was to give up.

2. Arguments that can be made against the use of atomic bombs, there are several.

The main and most important is to recognize that chemical weapons not only affect the place where they were released, sooner or later the effect will spread and nobody knows the damage they are making to the planet. but do not forget also the damage they do at immediate term.

The loss of life would have been greater if a conventional invasion of Japan occurred.

Japan seemed unwilling to surrender even in the face of almost certain defeat without an overwhelming show of force.

It would be immoral to kill civilians who would inevitably be killed in such an attack.

Using such a weapon would simply encourage other countries to develop such weapons—this would endanger the whole world.

Explanation:

from pennfoster

your answer is

relations between the soviet union and the united states were driven by a complex interplay of ideological, political, and economic factors, which led to shifts between cautious cooperation and often bitter superpower rivalry over the years. the distinct differences in the political systems of the two countries often prevented them from reaching a mutual understanding on key policy issues and even, as in the case of the cuban missile crisis, brought them to the brink of war.

the united states government was initially hostile to the soviet leaders for taking russia out of world war i and was opposed to a state ideologically based on communism. although the united states embarked on a famine relief program in the soviet union in the early 1920s and american businessmen established commercial ties there during the period of the new economic policy (1921–29), the two countries did not establish diplomatic relations until 1933. by that time, the totalitarian nature of joseph stalin's regime presented an insurmountable obstacle to friendly relations with the west. although world war ii brought the two countries into alliance, based on the common aim of defeating nazi germany, the soviet union's aggressive, antidemocratic policy toward eastern europe had created tensions even before the war ended.

answer:

won re-nomination with no opposition he also had the support of his party

explanation:

it saw incumbent president andrew jackson, candidate of the democratic party, defeat henry clay, candidate of the national republican party. jackson won re-nomination with no opposition, and the 1832 democratic national convention replaced vice president john c. calhoun with martin van buren.