Which statement explains why the american public reacted differently to the formation of the united nations than it had to the formation of league of nations? the end of world war ii did not result in the same isolationism in the united states that had resulted after world war i. the united nations was supported by all of the allies, whereas the league of nations had been opposed by most of the allies. the american public was more concerned about communism after world war ii than it had been after world war i. the united states was not expected to contribute as much money to the united

Actually, the correct answer is A "The end of World War II did not result in the same isolationism in the United States that had resulted after World War I." :)

khdkajd; lkad 'lk; aldkdjladkjkldhla

explanation:

hadkhadkhapkldjlkajdlfja

in the 1800s, chinese workers migrated to the united states, first to work in the gold mines, but also to take agricultural jobs, and factory work, especially in the garment industry. chinese immigrants were particularly instrumental in building railroads in the american west, and as chinese laborers grew successful in the united states, a number of them became entrepreneurs in their own right. as the numbers of chinese laborers increased, so did the strength of anti-chinese sentiment among other workers in the american economy. this finally resulted in legislation that aimed to limit future immigration of chinese workers to the united states, and threatened to sour diplomatic relations between the united states and china.