Why did the french conclude that monarchy was the best for stability?

France concludes that monarchy is best for stability because monarchs are better than any elected president. Monarchs aren´t chosen by people,  therefore, there are not race, gender, religious or political alignment beliefs involved. This will have a good impact on the decisions the monarch makes, she or he will be much more neutral and therefore much fair for every person in the country. Also, monarchs rule for longer periods of time so the economic and political decisions are more stable throughout the years. This two reasons and maybe many more are the ones who convinced the French that monarchy is best for their stability.

pizarro staged a mock trial and found atahualpa guilty of revolting against the spanish, practicing idolatry, and murdering huáscar, his brother. atahualpa was sentenced to execution by burning. he was horrified, since the inca believed that the soul would not be able to go on to the afterlife if the body were burned.

when christopher columbus arrived on the bahamian island of guanahani (san salvador) in 1492, he encountered the taíno people, whom he described in letters as "naked as the day they were born." taíno influences survived, however, and today appear in the beliefs, religions, language, and music of caribbean cultures.

ad 1492: taíno meet columbus; “new world” gets new diseases. in the bahamas, the taíno are 125,000 strong in 1492 when they encounter the crew and the italian captain of three spanish ships. christopher columbus seeks a shorter sea route to india to spain get a foothold in the profitable spice trade.

hope this

p.s plz make me a brinties

a yes vote means: the legislature, with a two-thirds vote, could change daylight saving time if the change is allowed by the federal government. absent any legislative change, california would maintain its current daylight saving time period