What’s one major difference between potter’s and holt’s historical interpretations of the civil war?

Potter's Historical Interpretations of the Civil War

Historians say that he had an unbalanced intellectual history, since he offered a level of patience to the pro-slavery ideologies that he does not award to the anti-slavery movement. Abolitionists were everything from abusive to humanitarians, according to Potter.

Holt's Historical Interpretation of the Civil War

Holt, on the other hand, was a professor so he provided a more lucid interpretation of the Civil War, as a matter of fact, Holt sees the conflict as a breakdown in America's democratic political process. No longer differences had to be resolved within the arena of battle, according to him.

the andes or andean mountains (spanish: cordillera de los andes) are the longest continental mountain range in the world, forming a continuous highland along the western edge of south america. this range is about 7,000 km (4,300 mi) long, about 200 to 700 km (120 to 430 mi) wide (widest between 18° south and 20° south latitude), and of an average height of about 4,000 m (13,000 ft). the andes extend from north to south through seven south american countries: venezuela, colombia, ecuador, peru, bolivia, chile and argentina.

from wikipedia

hope this !

monasticism. people often do monasticism in monasteries