The declaration of independence is a statement of “why we choose to rule ourselves.” the constitution is a statement of “how we choose to rule ourselves.” referring to the documents, write 300 words comparing those two purposes. what do the texts have in common? in which ways are they different? how do their differing purposes change the emphases of the two texts?

This two texts have in common that even though, The Declaration of Independece justifies why they want to rule themselves and The Constitution explains how they choose to rule themselves, they both are steps to achieve one goal that is being independent. They both explain the road that the people will go through so as to prove that they are capable of ruling themselves and that it can be positive for their society.

This texts are also different from each other because The Declaration of Independence trys to justify their desire of independence and autonomy. This statament expresses the reasons of this decision taken by the people.

On the other way, The Constitution express their ways to operate, it means, how do they plan to achieve their autonomy. This are the guidelines that they will follow in order to prove that they can rule themselves and that they do not need the pressure or guidelines of another people that are foreign.

Both of the statements have different purposes and they express different matters. Each one of them, makes emphases in their own matters so as to be clear. The Declaration of independence, expresses the reasons why the people want to be independent explaining how do the pople suffer the rules of someone foreign, that men are all the same and everyone deserves to be treated with respect and also choose how to be treated. And The Constitution explains their plans and guidelines showing what they try to do, and how are they going to choose their authorities, the requirements needed to occupate the charges, the areas that the government will have and many otters rules that they will accept and follow.

for the points : )

explanation:

isolationism is a doctrine practiced by the united states for much of its history with the aim of not intervening in external affairs that did not pose a real threat to their country. the united states managed to maintain a state of political isolation throughout the nineteenth century and the first part of the xx. few nations have been able to maintain such a position for such a long period of time. historians argue that it is largely due to geographical reasons, given the physical distance between europe and the usa. uu the venataja of this situation is that the national state can spend its resources in satisfying all the needs of its inhabitants, without the need to invest in armament and equipment for a war that does not directly affect the country.

internationalism is a political and cultural movement that advocates for greater political and economic cooperation among nations for mutual benefit. this novimiento was transformed over time, today it includes military intervention in international conflicts with the objective of maintaining peace. the advantage of this move is in the international contacts and the influence developed by the country that carries it forward.

between the two modes of relations between states, i prefer the first, since i believe it is of the utmost importance to satisfy the needs of citizens and work for their development and as a last option to act on the international level.