Which of the following best summarizes how the conflicts in rwanda in 1994 are related to the holocaust

Response:  The events in Rwanda show that genocide can still happen, despite the impact of the Holocaust.

Explanation/context:

The genocide in Rwanda had arisen out of problems created by colonialism in that country.  The Dutch colonial government had favored the Tutsi people over the Hutus.  That played into the violence by Hutus against Tutsis when the Hutus came into power in Rwanda.   When the genocide began to occur, the international community mostly did nothing.  Bill Clinton, who was America's president at the time, refers to inaction toward the Rwanda situation as one of the greatest regrets of his presidency.  

The Holocaust was an act of genocide, motivated by racial hatred of a people -- in that case, Jewish people.  Similarly, the genocide in Rwanda was motivated by racial and ethnic hatred which had been inflamed by the way that Dutch colonial governors favored one tribal group over another based on a lighter shade of skin color.

can you give me more details?

explanation:

the federal constitution of the united mexican states of 1824 was enacted on october 4 of 1824, after the overthrow of the mexican empire of agustin de iturbide. in the new constitution, the republic took the name of of united mexican states. it was replaced by the federal constitution of the united mexican states in 1857.