[t]he decline of rome was the natural and inevitable effect of immoderate [excessive] greatness. prosperity ripened the principle of decay; the causes of destruction multiplied with the extent of conquest; and, as soon as time or accident had removed the artificial supports, the stupendous fabric yielded to the pressure of its own weight. this is a passage from a famous book by edward gibbon called the decline and fall of the roman empire. gibbon was a english historian who devoted much of his life documenting the history of rome’s fall. what is the main idea of this passage? rome fell because of food shortages and inflation. rome fell because it had conquered too much territory. rome fell because it hired too many mercenaries. rome fell because its government had become politically unstable.

Rome fell because it had conquered too much territory.

In this excerpt, Gibbon is arguing that the main reason why the Roman Empire fell was because of the difficulty of maintaining stability over such a large territory. He claims that "the causes of destruction multiplied with the extent of conquest," arguing that the more territory they acquired, the more potential for problems they found. He thinks this is a natural and inevitable end for empires that reach the "excessive greatness" that Rome enjoyed.

The answer is: "Rome fell because it had conquered too much territory."

Explanation:

answer: nope

explanation: because theirs barely anyone on here to you. but let me see the question. maybe i can , if i know the answer!

a change of venue is the legal term for moving a trial to a new location. a change of venue request because venue is improper means that the removing defendant believes that the case may not be in that venue because it is improper under procedural rules.