Acommittee is one of sixteen permanent senate committees blank a joint committee is staffed by blank. special andcommittees are temporary and have limited jurisdiction blank

1. standing

2. both parties

3. select

EDGE confirmed

A standing committee is one of sixteen permanent Senate committees.

A joint committee is staffed by both houses.

Special and select committees are temporary and have limited jurisdiction

Explanation:

Without the committee system, the Legislative branch of the government would not be able to deal with all legislation related to the nation itself (such as economy, agriculture, regulation, and the military) and to international affairs. This is why Congress divides its tasks into four types of committees, which at the same time, divide themselves in many sub-committees.

The standing, or permanent, committee is the one that has legislative jurisdiction (It considers and proposes bills, for example). There are twenty standing committees in the House and sixteen in the Senate (Therefore, a standing committee is one of sixteen permanent Senate committees).

The joint committee, which is in charged with exploring and informing certain issues, is staffed by members of both the House and the Senate

Special, ad hoc and select committees are temporary committees and have limited jurisdiction as they can only address specific topics such as to conduct special investigations.

Lastly, conference committees, which are also temporary, is used to reconcile different bills passed in both the House and the Senate.

yes.

an illinois concealed carry license (ccl) is required to conceal carry a firearm in illinois. the license permits the licensee to carry a concealed loaded or unloaded handgun on his or her person or within a vehicle.

in moral and political philosophy, the social contract is a theory or model that originated during the age of enlightenment and usually concerns the legitimacy of the authority of the state over the individual.

explanation:

in the united states, the president is controlled by the

constitution, and in all respects subordinate to it. insofar

as it deals with presidential power, however, the american

constitution has proved to be a highly malleable document.

with very few exceptions,' the constitutional provisions relating to the president have not been changed at all since

they were ratified in 1787. but in the late twentieth century, those provisions do not mean what they meant in

1787. the constitution is a legal document, and it is enforced judicially; but its meaning was hardly fixed when it

was ratified. in particular, the contemporary president has

far broader powers than the original constitution contemplated. it is remarkable but true that large-scale changes in

the authority of the president have been brought about

without changes in the constitutional text, but nevertheless

without significant illegality.

this is a paradox. is it not clear that constitutional

changes, if not textual, are illegal? the paradox has considerable relevance to our current thinking about the presidency in particular and about constitutionalism in general.

perhaps the framers of the american constitution feared

legislative power most of all; 2 but from well-known events

in the twentieth century, it is possible to conclude that it is

presidential power that holds out the greatest risks to both

liberty and democracy. the president is by far the most visible leader in the nation; he is often the only person in government with a national constituency. moreover, he is