Why did allan bakke file a lawsuit? a. his medical test application was incorrectly scored.                                                    b. he was an advocate of affirmative action.                                                                    c. his test scores were lower than minority students.                                                          d. he felt he was denied admission to school based on race. 

D. He felt he was denied admission to school based on race.  

Explanation:

Bakke decision, formally Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, controlling in which, on June 28, 1978, the U.S. Preeminent Court proclaimed governmental policy regarding minorities in society established yet negated the utilization of racial portions. The medicinal school at the University of California, Davis, as a component of the college's governmental policy regarding minorities in society program, had saved 16 percent of its affirmation places for minority candidates. Allan Bakke, a white California man who had twice ineffectively connected for admission to the restorative school, documented suit against the college. Referring to prove that his evaluations and test scores outperformed those of numerous minority understudies who had been acknowledged for affirmation, Bakke charged that he had endured out of line "turn around segregation" based on race, which he contended was in opposition to the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the equivalent assurance condition of the U.S. Constitution's Fourteenth Amendment.

The Supreme Court, in an exceedingly broken decision (six separate suppositions were issued), concurred that the college's utilization of exacting racial shares was illegal and requested that the therapeutic school concede Bakke, however it additionally battled that race could be utilized as one standard in the affirmations choices of establishments of advanced education. Despite the fact that the decision legitimized the utilization of governmental policy regarding minorities in society, in resulting choices amid the following quite a few years the court constrained the extent of such projects, and a few U.S. states precluded governmental policy regarding minorities in society programs dependent on race.

D. He felt he was denied admission to school based on race.

Allan Bakke was almost 30 years old when he had applied for admission to medical school, but he was rejected on account of his age. He filed a lawsuit against the University of California, after being rejected twice, challenging the constitutionality of the school’s affirmative action program. The California Supreme Court upheld his case and ordered the University to admit him, after decreeing their affirmative action program as violative of the rights of white applicants.  

Further Explanation:

In the case of the Regents of the University of California v Bakke, the Supreme Court upheld the affirmative action policy, which considered race to be one of the factors in college admission policy. However, this was not extended to specific racial quotas. The system of desegregation included the removal of racial barriers in educational institutions, at their own pace. The process of integration was carried on smoothly in public educational institutions and universities, however, selective professional programs gave preference to all white students, undermining the Fourteenth Constitutional Amendment Act, and the rulings that emerged from the Brown v Board of Education case. This was a setback to the educational opportunities available to African Americans, who were not entitled to the same quality of education that would enable them to compete with other white students. Allan Bakke had cited evidence of his grades and test scores, that surpassed many minority students, and claimed to have suffered reverse discrimination, which was a clear violation of the 1964 civil rights Act, and equal protection clause of the U.S. Constitution’s Fourteenth Amendment. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of Bakke, but also opined the significance of the reserving of seats for minorities in institutions of higher education.

Learn more:

1. The impact of furman v. Georgia (1972) was that states had to promise to use the death penalty only with approval from the supreme court. throw out the old Miranda warning and write a new one. agree to throw out all state laws regarding crime and impose national standards. create clear standards to be applied fairly before imposing the death penalty?

2. Why were taxes an ongoing source of conflict for the American colonists?

Answer Details:

Grade: Secondary School.

Chapter: Racial segregation in the United States.

Subject: History.

Keywords:

Affirmative action program, segregation, race, constitutionality, Fourteenth Amendment Act, reverse discrimination, Brown v Board of education case.

i know social security wasn't one.

explanation:

hope my answer has you!