Archaeologists' discovery of stone age family burials in europe was sociologically significant because

The reason why the discovery of Stone Age family burial sites in Europe is significant is because cultural practices towards the dead can tell us a lot about the type of humans that existed at the time.  It can tell us whether these people were capable of abstract thinking, and also whether they understand the inevitability and irreversibility of death

Family burials in particular can also provide evidence of social hierarchies. The Neolithic burial chambers found in England show that the bones of the dead were used to mark social and family allegiances. Finally, some burials, like that of El Sidron in Spain, show signs of violence in the bones, and the family buried there showed severe signs of malnutrition. This had led scientists to believe that cannibalism, whether for nutritional or ritualistic purposes, was practiced.

the great compromise was the deal of how representation for each state in congress as written in the constitution worked. small states such as new jersey wanted each state to have an equal amount of representatives regardless of their population. bigger states such as virginia wanted each state to have representation based solely on their population. the compromise itself states there would be a senate (equal representation for each state) and a house of representatives (representation based on population).

due to this explanation, i don't really think you could say small states and large states gave up something specifically. you could say the small states gave up their want for each state to have an equal amount of representatives regardless of their population, and you could say the large states gave up their want for each state to have representation based solely on their population, but technically the great compromise worked it out really well!

or in shorter terms how they would be represented in congress.