Which best explains how constantinople’s location affected economic growth in byzantine? constantinople’s location allowed many people to move there from rural areas and start businesses. constantinople’s location allowed many traders to start journeys in search of valuable goods. constantinople’s location connected the eastern and western roman empires and brought business. constantinople’s location connected europe with the east and attracted traders with valuable goods.

Constantinople’s location connected Europe with the East and attracted traders with valuable goods.

Constantinople  was a transit point between Europe and Asia, it sat on the land routes between the east and west. Its defense could also not be easily bridged

The statement that best explains how Constantinople's location affected economic growth in the Byzantine empire is the last one:

"Constantinople's location connected Europe with East and attracted traders with valuable goods"

Due to its geographically strategic position, Constantinople was the connection point between Europe and East and became one of the largest and richest urban centers in the Eastern Mediterranean. Its position allowed the city to command the trade routes between the Aegean Sea and the Black Sea. And apart from that, the city was also commonly known as the "Queen of cities" because of its beauty; which attracted many visitors and traders/merchants who usually brought valuable goods with them.

- three-quarters or two-thirds..

- "the constitution provides that an amendment may be proposed either by the congress with a two-thirds majority vote in both the house of representatives and the senate or by a constitutional convention called for by two-thirds of the state legislatures."

< 3

"germany's geographic location was an advantage when it was on the offensive in the war because it was situated next to an extremely wide river, the rhine, which was difficult for the allies to cross."