The supreme courts decisions in terry v. ohio (1967) and horton v. california (1990) both held that the police

Answer : May, in certain cases, search individuals or seize their property without a warrant.

Explanation : Horton v. California, 496 U.S. 128 (1990), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the Fourth Amendment does not prohibit the warrant less seizure of evidence which is in plain view. whereas in Terry v. Ohio (1967), in which the Supreme Court held that there may be certain cases where, they can search individuals or seize their property without a warrant.

hes right^^^

Explanation:

follow me on ig at treceongotfanz

b. after i get up in the morning,

explanation:

after is a subordinating conjunction that introduces a time clause. time clauses are dependent clauses used to indicate when something happened.

the clause "after i get up in the morning" tells when the action in the main clause (drinking a cup of coffee) happens:

"after i get up in the morning, i drink a cup of coffee." it is the most logical choice of all.