In hostage crises, is it ethical for a government to agree to grant a terrorist immunity if he releases the hostages, even though the government has every intention of capturing and prosecuting the terrorist once his hostages are released? in cours hero

It is a moral action for an administration to give consent in allowing a fear monger invulnerability if it weren’t for the prisoners in a prisoner emergency. The reason for this is because of the organization’s commitment t o give every local of its country a chance. Once the detainees are released, the organization has a point of getting and arraigning the fear mongers.

- "schenck v. united states, case in which the u.s. supreme court ruled on march 3, 1919, that the freedom of speech protection afforded in the u.s. constitution's first amendment could be restricted if the words spoken or printed represented to society a “clear and present danger.” "

- speech aimed to potentially create danger could be banned.

< 3