Why are primary sources important when studying historical events ?

Primary sources are important when studying historical events, because they generally give eye-witness accounts of what is going on, albeit with opinions. They give historians a view of what a certain group of people think, the actions they take, and how the events affect their everyday lives. Primary sources also allow others to build on top of it, and to give 'parts of the "whole"', such as the pieces of a puzzle, to giving those in the future a more narrow and personal outlook of things.

hope this helps

considered the turning point in pacific war. the japanese tried to lure the american navy out so it could be destroyed but failed. the americans were led by admiral chester nimitz. the victory by america would put them on the offensive for the remainder of the war.

due to inefficiency of management, the business plan has failed

idk what right product means but i assume it's this one since this was the last one left after i did the other three

the finance team has misjudged the requirement of business plan and chosen a wrong line of credit

operations risk is when the employees make a mistake

flash floods have damaged all machinery in the main manufacturing

natural disasters include anything ruined in the business by the weather or other disasters such as earthquakes

there have been foreign exchange rate fluctuations

economic risks is when things in the economy changes (like interest rates, currency value). the government has a large part in controlling this