Why is it sometimes so difficult to determine causation

1)  Because of "lurking variables" .

2) Because correlation does not necessarily imply causation.

  That being said, correlation may suggest causation, but to what extent may not alway be known.

3)  This extent may not be known since "unknown" or "missing" pieces of information may be unavailable or need to be researched or evaluated;  and and types of biased need to considered in determining validity and reliability.

yes based on alexanders actions he deserved the title of "the great". his empire covered about 3,000 miles and he was able to establish the empire over a 13 year period of time. he was able to conquer many different places. he also defeated the persians. he conquered egypt and developed a city and named it after himself.