In the lesson, you played the role of a juror in the case of snoozer v. early. what type of case was it, and what could be its outcome? (3 points)

The type of case in the lesson where I played the role of a juror in the case of Snoozer v. Early was a civil case. Snoozer was seeking compensation for the loss of her birds and this constitutes that it involved private disputes between Snoozer and Early.

A civil case.

Explanation:

During the case which is being described in this current question, where I had to play the role of a juror, I have to say that Snoozer v. Early was a civil case in which the plaintiff, Suzy Snoozer, demands a way of compensation due to her missing birds. The best possible outcome for this case would be that those in charge to make the final decision wether the suspect is found guilty or not, take into account all verified and trustful evidence as well as the each part's statements.

the amount of the purse is, $120.

tax rate =9%

first find the the total tax she paid on the amount is equal to the 9% of $120 i.e,

now,

total amount paid by shalika = $120 +$10.8 = $130.8

answer: a

explanation:  

stocks and bonds are the two main classes of assets investors use in their portfolios. stocks offer an ownership stake in a company, while bonds are akin to loans made to a company (a corporate bond) or other organization (like the u.s. treasury). in general, stocks are considered riskier and more volatile than bonds.

savings accounts are just money in a bank- they are insured by the fdic for up to 250,000.   very little risk

the average mutual fund holds hundreds of different securities, which means mutual fund shareholders gain important diversification at a low price. which means if one stock or bond drops it will have very little affect on the mutual fund - again very little risk