Both india and vietnam experienced periods of chaos and conflict following the success of their independence movements. how did these conflicts differ?   for apex.

While it is true that both India and Vietnam suffered moments of social and political turmoil during their independence processes, with civilian casualties and great social consequences, there is a big difference between the two conflicts and the way they ended: India gained its independence through of non-violent methods, guided by leaders like Mahatma Ghandi, this nation led peaceful protests, strikes, symbolic demonstrations and all kinds of calls for attention to Britain but not including any type of aggression within them. Vietnam, on the other hand, faced its colonizer, France, through guerrilla warfare, in a conflict that extended from 1946 to 1954 and culminated in the independence of Vietnam and the subsequent division of the country, which led to the Vietnam War.

george washington =

-he was a general and comander-in-cheif he solve he solve wars

-he was intelient and physically cordnated

tohmas jefferson

james madison

james monroe

- "the past is made of multitudinous items ranging from anything that can be collected, recollected or assessed to originate in the past. as such, the past is a gallimaufry of particulars that may not have been related in any way. however, the human mind seeks organization to understand concepts and other things. the human mind therefore seeks relationships in explaining and studying the past. history being a humanity, dictates that historians have to serve this human trait by bringing structure to details of the past. historians do this by creating interpretive frameworks that capture as many details as possible."

< 3