What would be the strongest evidence to use in support of the argument that drivers over the age of 65 should be retested on a regular basis?

What would be the strongest evidence to use in support of the argument that drivers over the age of 65 should be retested on a regular basis?

The strongest evidence that could be used to support the argument that drivers over the age of 65 should be retested on a regular basis would be the fact that a NHTSA study of 1995 FARS (Fatal Accident Reporting System) data reports that senior citizens accounted for: 5% of all people injured in traffic crashes, 13% of all traffic fatalities, 13% of all vehicle occupant fatalities, and 18% of all pedestrian fatalities.

I hope it helps, Regards.

Ibelieve this would be an obstacle.

Gwould be the correct answer