In this case, the pork packing houses contracted with farmers to buy hogs at a specified price. After the H1N1 (swine flu) scare, pork prices fell and packers want the court to release them from their contracts with the producers because of low pork prices in the stores. If the court allows the contract to be broken the farmers may be forced out of business. If the court does not allow the contract to be broken then the packers will lose money and may be forced out of business. What should be the ruling of the court in the Swine Flu case? Explain your opinion

nope, but i have cleaned my brush in my cup of not as potentially harmful but nevertheless, very upsetting for scottish/british folks. especially if you've used the last teabag for it

explanation:

there could be something in that . . i am indeed an old scottish man!

there's a bit of bolshie-ness with it too though. i won't let go of the old ways . . tea and whisky . . whether the young whippersnappers like it or not!

the members of alcoholic anonymous aren't required to disclose their last names.

the answer is false, i know this answer is late but its for anyone else that needs it.