The population-ecology perspective argues that it is healthy for society to have new organizations emerging and old organizations dying as the environment changes. Do you agree? Why would European countries pass laws to sustain traditional organizations and inhibit the emergence of new ones?

        Ecology will always look to improve their methods of preserving the environment, but countries don't think this way.

Explanation:

       Traditional countries prefer to trust old organizations because, for example, in Europe, these organizations are trustworthy, and this is very important for the economy, once you already know what to expect from this organization, but once a new one rises up, you need to take care of it more carefuly, because this new one that is emerging won't deal with things the same way the old ones do.

Yes,it is true that it is healthy for a society to have new organizations emerge as old organizations die as the environment changes.

The reason is that the Environmental factors cause changes, which affects iorganizations and for Organisations to survive they must change in line with the environment.

(Part B)

(1) To protect their Cultural heritage and identity.

(2) to promote societal values and morals

(3) To prevent the proliferation of social vices.

Explanation: Population ecology is a term used to describe the various changes that takes place in a society and the impact of those changes in the population. The study of population ecology is essential to ensure the continued survival of members of the society.

IT IS NECESSARY FOR NEW MEMBERS TO REPLACE THE OLD MEMBERS OF A SOCIETY OR AN ENVIRONMENT IN ORDER TO GUARANTEE SUCCESS.

European countries pass laws to protect traditional Organisations in order to

(1) To protect their Cultural and traditional heritage and identity.

(2) to promote societal values and morals.

(3) To prevent the proliferation of social vices.

nope

explanation:

men