Iam writing a debate. i do not get to choose what my topic or stance is. i got "should professional athletes be able to take human growth hormones without punishment? " can anyone me with what i should write or what kind of information i should give? i am on the pro side so i am for it.

You should probably add in some details to support your reasoning and some key details alongside sentences to grab your readers attention for why Professional athletes should be able to take human growth hormones without punishment.

The question is basically saying that, "Should professional athletes be able to take steroids without consequences?". Steroids and other supplements are temporary and can damage your physical appearance over time. Such things are also not permitted in famous sports or sporting events. But, if you're for it then here are some things you can do:

1. First, research pros and cons for using "human growth hormones"

2. Then you can take note of all the pros and put them together in your own words.

3. Maybe you can add how it helps the athlete or how it may give the athlete a better performance.

I hope this helped, even though its wasn't a direct answer. Have a nice day!

answer; genes dictate the production of specific enzymes, and affected individuals have genetic defects that cause them to lack certain enzymes;