What are some logical conclusions an archaeologist can draw from Ooparts rather than resorting to pseudo-archaeology?

In a 2010 article “fact check: eastern u.s. earthquake risk” by chris mould, the author provides as evidence the following statement by the united states geological survey: “although earthquakes may be less frequent in the eastern u.s., … urban areas in the east could face bigger losses because the shaking would affect much larger areas than similar quakes in the west. in addition, most homes and buildings in the east are not designed to withstand earthquakes.”this statement directly relates to which of the following concepts? a. vulnerabilityb. hazardc. riskd. severity

What is the reason for the “scramble for africa”?

What is an additional type of erosion found at the coast? what does it mean?