3. in which case did the u. s. supreme court decide that the press was protected from libel suits unless the offended party could prove malice by the media?

a schenk v. united states.

b new york times v. sullivan.

c barron v. baltimore.

d lemon v. kurtzmann.

e lynch v. donnelly.

B New York Times v. Sullivan.

Explanation:

The correct answer is

B New York Times v. Sullivan.

In this case, in 1960, the NY times publish an advertisement and defense of Martin Luther King and the Civil Rights Movement. The advertisement had some small facts stated wrongly, and so a police commissioner from Montgomery, Alabama, named Sullivan sued the NY Times for defamation. However, he could not prove that there was any malice in the ad. The US Supreme Court defended the NY Times, and defended the free reporting of the civil rights movement. So, it protected the press from libel suits unless the offended party could prove malice by the media.

answer; (d) melting of sea ice;

for e2020. the answer would be some directions from the mountain range so we can find mt. whitney. to locate which direction is north, you should use a   compass. this would not only find mt. whitney, but also becuase of this long paragraph you would get points because it's not like anyone actually reads your work becuase once they read the first sentence it sounds dumb enough to not read becuase i'm not good at answering this but the answer is compass for your benefit.

for e2020 ; -;