Which of these situations qualify as plagiarism? choose 2 or 3 answer
-alan submitted a paper written by someone else that he found online
-shane included universal facts in his paper and didn't add citations
-lily paraphrased information from various sources and added citations
-sam used the wrong style to format his in-text citations and bibliography
-karen forgot to cite the sources she quoted in her paper

The situations that could qualify as plagiarism would be the first, the second as well as the fifth.

Explanation:

Plagiarism is defined as the act of deliberately taking and communicating other people’s words and ideas, pretending that they are your own. Or in other words,  plagiarism consists of using someone else’s work and pretending that it is your own.  

The most common ways in which people plagiarise include:  first, finding online  an essay which deal with a similar to your research topic and handing it  in as if you were written it. Second, copying someone else’s ideas without giving credit, that is to say, without including citations, and finally, not putting quotes in quotation marks, to name a few of the ways in which someone could  plagiarise.

innocence can be defined as the lack of sin, relating it with the lack of guilt, also it can be a synonime of naivety. most people agree that sins are made out of experiences, intentionally or not, as well as you stop being naive once certain things happen to you throughout your life. so, with this explained, the chosen answers are:

when the boy saw the effects of war, he no longer viewed life as innocent.

the loss of innocence is a result of gaining experience and making mistakes.

one way to define innocence is as a lack of worldly experience or sophistication.

i do not the question is put in the corrorect order