Which is the strongest revision of the following sentence? if students can not be noisy, have all their trash picked up afterward, and not enter other buildings during lunch, then they can eat on the hill outside the cafeteria. a) students will be allowed to eat lunch on the hill outside of the cafeteria if they keep quiet, avoid entering other buildings, and clean up their trash afterward. b) students will be allowed to eat lunch on the hill outside of the cafeteria if the noise level is kept down, they stay on the hill, and trash is cleaned up afterward. c) if students can not be noisy, have all their trash picked up afterward, and not enter other buildings during lunch, then they can eat on the hill outside the cafeteria. d) if students can keep down the noise and their trash is cleaned up afterward, then they can eat lunch on the hill outside the cafeteria if they also avoid entering other buildings.

A) Students will be allowed to eat lunch on the hill outside of the cafeteria if they keep quiet, avoid entering other buildings, and clean up their trash afterward.

Explanation:

The first part of the answer (if they keep quiet) is alluded to by the first part in the text (can not be noisy). This phrase does not require a reduction in the level of noise, but a total absence of it.

The second part of the answer (avoid entering other buildings) is alluded to by the third part of the sentence (and not enter other buildings during lunch). The two phrases change just in word order and selection. The resemblance is clear.

The third part of the answer (clean up their trash afterward) is alluded to by the second part of the sentence (have all their trash picked up). The two sentences are, again, the same meaning in different word choices.

"the sandy walls seemed to collapse in on themselves"

and

"the bloodshot waters seemed to have no bottom"

they are direct opposites. they can both be corrupted. they are inseparable.