20 points will mark brainliest! in her new york times article "silicon valley sharknado,” maureen dowd discusses the development of machine intelligence. the statements here summarize different elements of dowd’s argumentative essay. match each summary statement to the appropriate element of an argumentative essay. tiles: - topic - claim or thesis - supporting evidence - rhetorical appeal to logic - rhetorical appeal to ethics pairs: - the idea of machines becoming superior to humans and taking over the world is unsettling. - if humans do not fully understand how the human brain functions, then they can't create an artificial brain that is more intelligent than the human brain. - google has launched a project that is intended to enable artificial intelligence to match human intelligence by the year 2029 and overtake it by 2045. - it is dishonest to trick humans into giving computers their knowledge without paying them for it. - robots with artificial intelligence will match or overtake human intelligence.

Announcer two: ladies and gentlemen, following on the news given in our bulletin a moment ago, the government meteorological bureau has requested the large observatories of the country to keep an astronomical watch on any further disturbances occurring on the planet mars. due to the unusual nature of this occurrence, we have arranged an interview with noted astronomer professor pierson, who will give us his views on the event. in a few moments we will take you to the princeton observatory at princeton, new jersey. we return you until then to the music of ramón raquello and his orchestra. the passage is from the transcript of the radio adaptation of the war of the worlds by h. g. wells. instead of including expert interviews, h. g. wells uses a narrator to tell about an alien invasion that occurred a few years earlier. by including expert interviews, how does the radio broadcast change the story most effectively? o.a. it puts the story in the past tense, increasing its personal tone. o o b. it makes the broadcast sound more like a fictional story. o o c. it makes the broadcast sound like a news report. o d. it makes the story sound less believable by changing who presents the story's details.