In elie wiesel's speech "the perils of indifference," one of the speaker's purposes seems to be to encourage the audience to prevent negative events in the past from being repeated in the future. does wiesel effectively convince his audience to keep history from repeting itself? why or why not?

How do you think langley employees reconcile the difference between the work they do that is innovative and advances humankind with the work they do that destroys it?

Read the following excerpt from life on the mississippi by mark twain. no girl could withstand his charms. he "cut out" every boy in the village. when his boat blew up at last, it diffused a tranquil contentment among us such as we had not known for months. but when he came home the next week, alive, renowned, and appeared in church all battered up and bandaged, a shining hero, stared at and wondered over by everybody, it seemed to us that the partiality of providence for an undeserving reptile had reached a point where it was open to criticism. how does twain's use of understatement serve his purpose? be sure to use specific details from the text to support your answer.

How does loma cervantes celebrate her culture in “freeway 280”? ?