subject
English, 25.07.2019 08:30 littlemiss114lp5woqn

Read the selection below from “the insufficiency of honesty” by stephen l. carter and answer the question that follows. when i refer to integrity, i have something very specific in mind. integrity, as i will use the term, requires three steps: discerning what is right and what is wrong; acting on what you have discerned, even at personal cost; and saying openly that you are acting on your understanding of right and wrong. the first criterion captures the idea that integrity requires a degree of moral reflectiveness. the second brings in the ideal of a person of integrity as steadfast, a quality that includes keeping one’s commitments. the third reminds us that a person of integrity can be trusted. source: carter, stephen l. “the insufficiency of honesty.” atlantic monthly feb. 1996: 74+. print. based on the passage above, which of the following reflects the correct use of the ellipsis? “integrity . . requires three steps” (carter). “. .[a]s i will use the term, [integrity] requires three steps,” according to carter. according to carter . . “integrity, as [he uses] the term, requires three steps.” carter states that “[i]ntegrity . . requires three steps” . .”.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on English

question
English, 22.06.2019 02:30
Reread lines 6-7 "the survivor." determine how the tone of these differs from the preceding lines (1-5)
Answers: 3
question
English, 22.06.2019 06:00
In the book hatchet why did brian think searchers would not find him
Answers: 3
question
English, 22.06.2019 07:00
Compare and contrast the merits and drawbacks of at least two of the scholarly approaches to literature described in this unit. be sure to mention at least one advantage that each approach has over the other. use one of the readings from this unit in your comparison. your answer should be at least 250 words.
Answers: 3
question
English, 22.06.2019 07:00
Read the passage. excerpt from "why equal pay is worth fighting for" by senator elizabeth warren, april 17, 2014 i honestly can't believe that we're still arguing over equal pay in 2014. when i started teaching elementary school after college, the public school district didn't hide the fact that it had two pay scales: one for men and one for women. women have made incredible strides since then. but 40 years later, we're still debating equal pay for equal work. women today still earn only 77 cents for every dollar a man earns, and they're taking a hit in nearly every occupation. bloomberg analyzed census data and found that median earnings for women were lower than those for men in 264 of 265 major occupation categories. in 99.6 percent of occupations, men get paid more than women. that's not an accident; that's discrimination. the effects of this discrimination are real, and they are long lasting. today, more young women go to college than men, but unequal pay makes it harder for them to pay back student loans. pay inequality also means a tougher retirement for women. . for middle-class families today, it usually takes two incomes to get by, and many families depend as much on mom's salary as they do on dad's, if not more. women are the main breadwinners, or joint breadwinners, in two-thirds of the families across the country, and pay discrimination makes it that much harder for these families to stay afloat. women are ready to fight back against pay discrimination, but it's not easy. today, a woman can get fired for asking the guy across the hall how much money he makes. here in the senate, sen. barbara mikulski (d-md.) introduced the paycheck fairness act to give women the tools to combat wage discrimination. it would ensure that salary differences have something to do with the actual job that they are doing, and not just because they are women. senator warren states that the effects of pay discrimination are long-lasting. is this a valid argument supported by accurate evidence? no; warren weakens her point by claiming that the paycheck fairness act would "give women the tools to combat wage discrimination." yes; warren supports her point by noting, "for middle-class families today, it usually takes two incomes to get by." yes; warren supports her point by noting, "pay inequality also means a tougher retirement for women." no; warren weakens her point by noting, "today, a woman can get fired for asking the guy across the hall how much money he makes."
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
Read the selection below from “the insufficiency of honesty” by stephen l. carter and answer the que...
Questions
question
Social Studies, 21.10.2019 23:50
question
Mathematics, 21.10.2019 23:50
question
Mathematics, 21.10.2019 23:50
Questions on the website: 13722361