English, 20.09.2019 02:50 Kinkela

1. what needs or values does the ad appeal to? how?
2. do you think the same approach to selling cigarettes would work today? why, or why not?

1. what needs or values does the ad appeal to? how? 2. do you think the same approach to sel

Answers: 1

Show answers

Answers

Answer from: clarkster112679

1- Appeals can be devided into, at least, three categories according to Aristotle's rhetorical appeals (ethos = ethics, pathos = emotions, logos = logics). Using this parameter, this add clearly uses pathos as it appeals to different feelings and needs that many people have for acceptance and popularity, and satisfaction. Here you see a consensus of admirable people (baseball players like Bucky Harris, Bob Elliott, Ted Williams, etc.) who use this product, which may lead you to believe that, by using their product, you can look like them. It's also stated in the add that Chesterfield is World's Best tobaccos, which can appeal to people's need for status (if you're smoking the best cigarrette, people will look at you with admiration over the next person who smokes a regular cigarrette, right?)

2- While persuasion by consensus is a type of pathos (emotional appeal) still used today, people nowadays are much more aware of the health risks related to smoking. In our current society, the logic behind people's awareness about this risks out-weights the effect that such a direct influence has on the audience. Therefore, people are much more likely to start smoking because they grew up around people who smoke (slow and constant = naturalization) versus a quick encounter with this type of advertisement.

Answer from: Quest

the answer is c 100% -apex

Answer from: Quest

- "a nonrestrictive clause functions as a modifier to a noun (that is an object, person or concept). these clauses can be described by the following three options: it is set off by comas, it contains a subject and a verbs and it adds nonessential information to the sentence.

for example, in "here is bill gates, who confounded microsoft software company" we can identify "who confounded microsoft software company" as a nonrestrictive clause modifying the noun bill gates. this clause can be describes as a nonrestrictive clause because it is separated by a comma, it adds nonessential information to identify who bill gates is and it must contain both a subject (who) and a verb (confounded)."

Another question on English

English, 21.06.2019 21:00

Auden's musée des beaux arts" and williams's "landscape with the fall oficarus" share which common element?

Answers: 2

Answer

English, 22.06.2019 01:00

Read the quotation from "an occurrence at owl creek bridge." and now he became conscious of a new disturbance. striking through the thought of his dear ones was a sound which he could neither ignore nor understand, a sharp, distinct, metallic percussion like the stroke of a blacksmithâ€™s hammer upon the anvil; it had the same ringing quality. he wondered what it was, and whether immeasurably distant or near byâ€”it seemed both. its recurrence was regular, but as slow as the tolling of a death knell. he awaited each stroke with impatience andâ€”he knew not whyâ€”apprehension. the intervals of silence grew progressively longer, the delays became maddening. with their greater infrequency the sounds increased in strength and sharpness. they hurt his ear like the thrust of a knife; he feared he would shriek. what he heard was the ticking of his watch. which best describes the effect of the narration in the excerpt? it suggests that the man being executed feels tranquil and at peace. it suggests that the narrator is sympathetic to the man being executed. it suggests that the plot will become less tense as the story continues. it suggests that the story will become more intense and mysterious.

Answers: 1

Answer

English, 22.06.2019 01:30

In this example, what does the author use to describe laurie

Answers: 1

Answer

English, 22.06.2019 08:10

Question 21 of 25 2 points which sentence is a claim that is both arguable and defensible? o a. giving children mobile phones can protect them in emergencies. b. mobile phones are bad for most individuals, especially children. o c. children should not be given mobile phones, d. mobile phones can be used for good or evil,

Answers: 2

Answer

You know the right answer?

1. what needs or values does the ad appeal to? how?
2. do you think the same approach to sel...

Questions