“the bane of the internet” is written in first-person subjective point of view, so the narrator tells the story as it is happening tells the story as it is happened in the past is a minor character who tells the story as it is happening none of the above

B). tells the story as it is happened.

Explanation:

The point of view is illustrated as the perspective or lenses through which the author reveals the narrative and the audience perceives a particular text. Out of varied point-of-views employed by the authors, 'first-person subjective' is one of them that discloses or unfolds the story through the author's memory and therefore, narrated as it occurred without any alteration.

As per the question, since "The Bane of the Internet" is authored in a 'first-person subjective point of view' thus, the narrator reveals the story 'as it happened' in the past. Such perspective usually displays the story from an author's/character's(not necessarily minor) perspective or opinions. However such points of view could be very limiting yet it reveals the story as it happened. Thus, option B is the correct answer.

- "a nonrestrictive clause functions as a modifier to a noun (that is an object, person or concept). these clauses can be described by the following three options: it is set off by comas, it contains a subject and a verbs and it adds nonessential information to the sentence.

for example, in "here is bill gates, who confounded microsoft software company" we can identify "who confounded microsoft software company" as a nonrestrictive clause modifying the noun bill gates. this clause can be describes as a nonrestrictive clause because it is separated by a comma, it adds nonessential information to identify who bill gates is and it must contain both a subject (who) and a verb (confounded)."

i would think its c but i'm not sure