Finish reading chapter 3 before responding. remember that you will need to quote the text to support your opinion. your response must be typed and should be about a page in length, double spaced with a 12-point font. here’s a good question: why nick? fitzgerald could have chosen any perspective for his point of view but he chose first person narration, and he developed mr. carraway for a purpose. why? based on what you’ve read so far, what do you think nick’s role is? how does it connect to the author’s own perspective? can we trust nick? (he says at the end of 39 that he is “the only honest man he’s ever known”; literary critics, however, often consider him hopelessly dishonest and hypocritical.)

all you have to do is draw a line and copy what is on the paper

the answer to this question is unstoppable.

rising action   i think i did this not sure

awnser: the oxford dictionary of quotations (oup 1970) has 66 pages of quotations

attributed to the writings of william shakespeare in which there are 2369 quotations,

which may reflect well over 5000 speeches, discussions, observations and comments

that are present in shakespeare’s work. it is largely from those speeches and discussions

on shakespeare’s 37 plays, as well as his, and others’ poems, that examples have been

taken here.

in this book all quotations from his poems and plays have been taken from various

editions of the arden shakespeare.

the writer is very much indebted to the rapid response provided by his son, henry

audley-charles , for cries of , guidance, advice and repairs to his ageing pc, that

henry provided at all hours. without this assistance over the last 3 years this book

could not have been written.

in addition, the writer is much for the kind by discussion and proof readings from

elizabeth macbeth and janet hulse; and for his knowledge of shakespeare’s plays and

poems in discussions with monsieur francis saillart; and especially for years of proof

reading, support and with this book from my wife brenda amy cordeiro. above

all, the debt i owe is to professor david price, vice provost research. he has acted as

the editor and the guide for the whole project. this has been far from easy with

changes repeatedly being made by the author and which continued after professor price

had provided all the editorial structure for this project.