Danger: cell phone driver by hank upp a law should be passed that bans the use of a cell phone while driving. too often i have seen people driving recklessly while engaged in conversation on a cell phone. they can't seem to find time to exercise proper vehicle functions or safe driving procedures because they are too busy gabbing on their little phones. one hand holds the phone to the ear, and the other hand might be used to steer. in fact, a study has shown that more accidents are caused by people using cell phones while driving than by people who are drunk while driving. the need for restricting cell phone use, then, is clear. these careless people are endangering you and me on the public streets, and i personally believe the time has come to call for an end to this needless and potentially dangerous practice. how does the author express his opinion in this passage? in argument essay style with balanced, opposing views with strong wording encouraging readers to take action using expert opinion to create awareness among readers citing examples of celebrity use to influence reader opinion with fallacious reasoning to win over reader approval

Iam awful at english and am so confused sos ignore the completely wrong diagram above

Which of the following statements most closely reflects the author's description of the action taken by the united states supreme court in cases brought before them having to do with the japanese internment? a. "three years almost to the day, the supreme court decided that imprisoning japanese-americans was unconstitutional. " b. "the supreme court decided in favor of the japanese-americans in the very first case brought before them." c. "fred korematsu had plastic surgery and changed his name to avoid internment, making it the deciding case in the issue." d. "in april 1942 mitsue endo lost his habeus corpus case, thus postponing the supreme court's negative decision."

Read the passage from animal farm. one sunday morning squealer announced that the hens, who had just come in to lay again, must surrender their eggs. napoleon had accepted, through whymper, a contract for four hundred eggs a week. the price of these would pay for enough grain and meal to keep the farm going till summer came on and conditions were easier. when the hens heard this, they raised a terrible outcry. they had been warned earlier that this sacrifice might be necessary, but had not believed that it would really happen. they were just getting their clutches ready for the spring sitting, and they protested that to take the eggs away now was murder. for the first time since the expulsion of jones, there was something resembling a rebellion. led by three young black minorca pullets, the hens made a determined effort to thwart napoleon's wishes. their method was to fly up to the rafters and there lay their eggs, which smashed to pieces on the floor. napoleon acted swiftly and ruthlessly. he ordered the hens' rations to be stopped, and decreed that any animal giving so much as a grain of corn to a hen should be punished by death. the dogs saw to it that these orders were carried out. for five days the hens held out, then they capitulated and went back to their nesting boxes. nine hens had died in the meantime. their bodies were buried in the orchard, and it was given out that they had died of coccidiosis. whymper heard nothing of this affair, and the eggs were duly delivered, a grocer's van driving up to the farm once a week to take them away. which detail from the passage supports the claim that this is an allegory for the great purge? the hens holding out for five days but capitulating the eggs being delivered to the grocer the protesting hens being intentionally starved coccidiosis spreading on the farm