What is the effect of the words poison and pollutes in this stanza? they emphasize the idea that thoughts can have negative effects. they illustrate the negative effects of not getting enough sleep. they show that negative thoughts alone are able to destroy one’s life. they suggest that human beings tend to be inherently negative.read the second stanza from "mutability.”we rest.—a dream has power to poison sleep;   we rise.—one wandering thought pollutes the day;   we feel, conceive or reason, laugh or weep;   embrace fond woe, or cast our cares away

The words ‘poison’ and ‘pollutes’ in the second stanza of the poem emphasizes the idea that thoughts can have negative effects.

Percy Bysshe Shelley in her poem “Mutability” touches upon the theme of thoughts that linger upon human’s mind. These thoughts affect more when a person is asleep. It is during the sleep that the thoughts start to control the subconscious mind. The theme of lack of freedom finds its place in the poem too. When a human is in sleep he loses freedom of thinking and analyzing things according to him. Thus, the external thoughts which are negative in nature start to conquer the mind. They ‘poison’ and ‘pollutes’ a mind in its subconscious state.

They emphasize the idea that thoughts can have negative effects.

Both poison and pollution are harmful toxins that can infiltrate a person's body and cause harm. In the stanza from "Mutability", a dream is described as having the power to harm sleep and a thought can destroy the day. These ideas have negative effects on a person. Option B is wrong because only one line from the stanza is about sleep, not the whole stanza. Option C is wrong because the stanza only talks about one sleep and one day, not a person's entire life. Option D is also incorrect. We don't have evidence that human beings are inherently negative In fact, the last two lines show more positivity.

do you have a picture of the cartoon?

emerson essentially believes that traveling is overrated. he supports this perspective through an initial focus on "the idea" of places like italy, england, and egypt, and the fascination of "educated americans" with them. he argues that those places only took on the grand, majestic ideas that they represent because "they who made england, italy, or greece venerable in the imagination did so by sticking fast where they were, like an axis of the earth." yes, those places are grand, but only because they so clearly represent the places that they are. the art and culture of italy, england, and egypt is authentic, and therefore significant.

plz mark brainliest