Christie is creating an outline for her research paper that argues in favor of making organic food compulsory in school cafeterias. what should she put in the introduction and the conclusion? in the introduction she should be 1, whereas in the conclusion she should 1-include the thesis statement and briefly mention her argument-discuss her personal opinion on the topic-present the results of her research paper-debate the counterarguments on the topic2 -mention the counterarguments in detail -introduce a new main point to strengthen her argument-quote evidence from a credible source-restate the thesis statement and tie up her argument

Read the excerpt from "politics and the english language" by george orwell. by this morning’s post i have received a pamphlet dealing with conditions in germany. the author tells me that he "felt impelled” to write it. i open it at random, and here is almost the first sentence that i see: "[the allies] have an opportunity not only of achieving a radical transformation of germany’s social and political structure in such a way as to avoid a nationalistic reaction in germany itself, but at the same time of laying the foundations of a cooperative and unified europe.” which statement is correct? orwell uses an example and statistical evidence in this excerpt. orwell uses an example and a quotation for evidence in this excerpt. orwell uses hypothetical and factual evidence in this excerpt. orwell uses hypothetical and statistical evidence in this excerpt.