How do judicial reviews in the dissent differ from those in the majority opinion? a) the arguments of the dissent are reviewed and summarized b) in the dissent, the majority opinion itself is used as evidence c) notes taken by the attorneys are used to support the dissent's argument. d) the dissent depends on previous, similar cases for support.

The difference is that in dissent, the majority opinion is used as evidence, as shown in option B.

We can arrive at this answer because:

When there are cases of dissent, the majority decision is used as evidence, while the majority decision does not consider dissent as evidence under any circumstances.

More information:

link

needs an explanation

the addition that would strengthen melissa’s thesis statement, both the dark game and the code book explain the importance of codebreaking, is :

main ideas of each book

melissa should discuss the main ideas of each book because these ideas will fully support her thesis statement. through these details, readers will also understand the importance of codebreaking that melissa referred to, which was inspired by the books.

plz mark me brainliest!

hope this !

explanation: