Textual evidence odysseus is a leader

in The Odyssey it can be said that he is shown to be more the bad than the good — this being down to his very arrogant side that got him into trouble with the gods more than once. His personal desire to have glory and fame often clouded Odysseus’ judgement as a leader and would often place his men in danger because of this. However; his poor leadership and judgement is a completely different “page” to his qualities as a hero etc. to the Greeks. BUT it was also said that Odysseus was cursed by Poseidon to wander the seas for 10 years during which he would lose all his men and only return through the aid of others — so you could say it was inevitable that his men were to be killed regardless of good or bad leadership — it really depends but Odysseus really didn’t help matters, and neither did his crew that appears to be rather built of men who didn’t use their brains.

In The Odyssey, Odysseus is presented to be a poor leader mainly through the bad choices he made: often thinking he knew better than the gods and thought he would succeed following only his plans. A good example of this particular point is the whole trouble with Scylla, the sea monster that lived a top of a jagged mountain peak over hanging a narrow channel/sea passage that Odysseus needed to stir his ship past. The witch-goddess Circe had warned Odysseus about Scylla and the futility of opposing her due to her strength and might; and Odysseus decided to not tell his men about the impending danger and made them carry on heading through the channel/sea passage instead of going around; yet despite this Odysseus dons his own armour ready to fight Scylla. This is one piece of evidence from The Odyssey that shows his poor quality as a leader because he led his men into an unsuspecting battle and made sure he was protected and ready so that he could get the glory: instead of heeding Circe’s warning. Six of Odysseus’ best men were killed as a result.

You could also say that Odysseus should have stayed with his men instead of going off to pray when they became stranded on the Island of Thrinacia due to a storm that Zeus had created. However this was more his men’s stupidity as they decided to go off and hunt the sacred cattle of the sun god Helios despite the warnings of Circe and the spirit Tiresias to not. Zeus punished Odysseus and his crew (through Helios wanting justice for the sacrilege) later on by causing them to suffering a shipwreck as they were driven towards Charybdis, the sister of Scylla and the huge sea monster that created a large whirlpool that sucked ships into her mouth. All of the remaining crew drowned or were eaten except for Odysseus who clung to a tree branch directly above Charybdis. Later he was rescued by Hermes from the Island of Ogygia after being forced to be Calypso’s lover.

Despite that however, Odysseus did take into consideration his crew when facing the Sirens on his homeward journey before he met Scylla and Charybdis. He saved his crews life by getting them to seal their ears with wax however, Odysseus wanted to hear the Siren’s song so he was simply tied to the ship’s mast…. They sailed past them with little incident. This particular part shows Odysseus actually using his brain and being a good leader — so it really does depend on what part of the Odyssey you read as he does excel himself in areas but then also does stupid things elsewhere.

In conclusion, Odysseus’ had bouts of bad leadership and glimmers of good judgement throughout The Odysseus - it really depends on how you want to look at the scenarios. Some could argue that Odysseus was trying to make his men not scared of Scylla and was trying to maintain order on his ship; whilst others will say he was completely wrong and it was because he didn’t tell his men about the approaching danger was why they were killed so quickly as they were not prepared, and others can say it was inevitable due to Poseidon’s curse/foresight — all will make sense but the one thing that The Odyssey does portray is that Odysseus always wanted glory and fame, and was incredibly arrogant when it came to the gods and because of this you could certainly say his judgement was clouded and he led his men into many perils that could have been handled differently or avoided.

Hope that helped answer your question or shed some light on the subject that others can then expand upon =)

hmm, sadly there is no dialogue. there is no place in the story where he is talking to anyone. it's more of just describing what he eats and where he sleeps. you have to become anne frank, give details of where you are, what other folks look like, how the environment is. have a little bit of dialogue tell of what people are specifically saying. anne frank talked about her entire household including the people, the objects, the lighting, the food they ate, and even the smell in the air. there has to be more to your diary entries, the whole story in its current state is only about peter van daan, the food, the sounds, and where he sleeps. also he seems to be writing only once a year yet more than that happened from day to day. for a friend, i can you write it out, if you want.

explanation:

margot’s silence imply? what will be her relationship with the other children from this point forward? remember, we read about how the most effective authors tap into the power of imagination. we have to use that imagination, and what we have learned about margot, her classmates, and their experiences