In this conversation, which group discussion technique does emily most clearly show? emily: wait, wait, that totally destroys the book's credibility! if medieval masterpieces [by francis eggbert] is fiction, and pettit is using it as a source, then that means pettit's assumptions are probably inaccurate. han: got that right. and eggbert is a famous historian. he's even got a show on the radio. a. challenging the credibility of sources b. conducting extra research c. asking clarifying questions d. determining new research goals

A. Challenging the credibility of sources.

Explanation: In the given conversation between Emily and Han, we can see that Emily clearly shows the group discussion technique of challenging the credibility of sources, by saying that Pettit's assumptions are probably inaccurate because they are based in a source that isn't reliable, the book "Medieval Masterpieces" by Francis Eggbert because even though Eggbert is an historian, that book is fiction, so it isn't a credible source.

the switch in narration increases the proximity of the narrator to the main character and the reader can perceive information only through the filter of a single character.

agamemnon was the leader of the greek troops in the trojan wars and orestes was his son. when agamemnon returned from the war, he was murdered by his wife's lover in conjunction with his wife. orestes could not stop them but he seeked vengeance for his father. after a long time, he found them and avenged his father while killing them. he killed his mother, but greek mythology claims that his act was just and he was spared the remorse and the guilt. there are a lot of similarities with the ulysses/telemachus father son pair. ulysses was also one of the leaders of the excursion to troy. he still has not returned home, but in a sense the suitors of penelope are marring his estate and his reputation. while penelope is faithful to ulysses, the suitors by taking hold of the palace and committing their shameful acts are dishonoring ulysses. in the same context, telemachus is asked just like orestes to restitution his father's honor, regardless of whether he is alive or dead. athena is him and encouraging him with this example and he himself feels the need to save his father