English, 04.08.2019 14:30 igtguith

Read the excerpt from queen elizabeth's response to parliament's request that she marry. as i have good cause, so do i give you all my hearty for the good zeal and loving care you seem to have, as well towards me as to the whole estate of your country. in this excerpt, queen elizabeth relies heavily on a rhetorical appeal to pathos by a) encouraging an emotional response from the audience. b) establishing her credibility as a capable leader. c) providing a logical reason for trusting her leadership skills. d) demonstrating her ability to speak persuasively. (c is incorrect)

Answers: 2

Show answers

Answers

The correct option is A.
There are three basic methods that are used to persuade people or to convince an audience. The methods are ethos, pathos and logos. Logos refers to an appeal to the audience's sense of logic while ethos appeal to the audience's sense of ethics. Pathos refers to an appeal to the audience's emotion. When the pathos method is used, an appeal to the emotion of the audience is used to draw the audience to the speaker's side.

Answer from: olivernolasco23

Explanation:

In 1559, Queen Elizabeth I delivered a speech which was a response to the Parliament's request for her marriage and produce an heir for the kingdom.

In her speech, she preserved her right that whether she should marry and whom she should marry. She has used the rhetorical appeal of pathos also known as an appeal to emotions.

She starts her speech with the given excerpt invoking emotions in her audience that she is thankful for the good care of her people who are concerned about her. She did in a manner to invoke an emotional response from her audience.

She tries to persuade her listeners by saying that she is already married to her kingdom the day she became a Queen, she married England and the citizen of England is her children.

So, the correct answer is option A.

Answer from: Quest

read this passage from the crisis. what rationale is paine using for going to war with great britain? my own line of reasoning is to myself as straight and clear as a ray of light. not all the treasures of the world, so far as i believe, could have induced me to support an offensive war, for i think it murder; but if a thief breaks into my house, burns and destroys my property, and kills or threatens to kill me, or those that are in it, and to "bind me in all cases whatsoever" to his absolute will, am i to suffer it? what signifies it to me, whether he who does it is a king or a common man; my countryman or not my countryman; whether it be done by an individual villain, or an army of them? if we reason to the root of things we shall find no difference; neither can any just cause be assigned why we should punish in the one case and pardon in the other.

it is waged war against an army of countrymen

it would lead to independence from britain

it would be an offensive war

it would be a defensive war

Answer from: Quest

hypothermia is a medical emergency that occurs when your body loses heat faster then it can produce heat, causing a dangerously low body temperature.

normal body temperature is around 98.6 (37 c) hypothermia occurs as your body temperature falls below 95 (35 c)

hope i was some : 3

sorry it took so long i did more research about my answer so

hope i !

Another question on English

English, 21.06.2019 20:10

Which piece of information about doris lessing would more likely be found in the new york times article "doris lessing wins nobel prize in literature" than in the "doris lessing" biographical video? the opinion lessing has of the current political climate in south africa description of the home which lessing and her husband live in today

Answers: 3

Answer

English, 22.06.2019 05:30

Simple subject mary will start the race in ten minutes

Answers: 1

Answer

English, 22.06.2019 07:00

How is theme of loneliness developed in chapter 4? thinking about the characters lennie,crooks,candy,and curley's wife

Answers: 1

Answer

English, 22.06.2019 15:30

Read the passage from chapter 17 of the prince. and of all princes, it is impossible for the new prince to avoid the imputation of cruelty, owing to new states being full of dangers. hence virgil, through the mouth of dido, excuses the inhumanity of her reign owing to its being new, saying: "res dura, et regni novitas me talia cogunt moliri, et late fines custode tueri."(*) nevertheless he ought to be slow to believe and to act, nor should he himself show fear, but proceed in a temperate manner with prudence and humanity, so that too much confidence may not make him incautious and too much distrust render him intolerable. . against my will, my fate a throne unsettled, and an infant state, bid me defend my realms with all my pow'rs, and guard with these severities my shores. which statement best evaluates machiavelli’s argument? machiavelli ineffectively argues that new princes should do everything in their power to guard their kingdoms. machiavelli effectively argues that new princes must be cruel and cautious in order to protect their new kingdoms. machiavelli effectively argues that new princes should not be cruel and should proceed carefully in their new kingdoms. machiavelli ineffectively argues that new princes should not show fear, but should be self-confident and intolerable.

Answers: 1

Answer

You know the right answer?

Read the excerpt from queen elizabeth's response to parliament's request that she marry. as i have g...

Questions