The time was in the 1720s. colonists were living in south carolina. they petitioned england. they wanted forts built to their south. what is the best way to combine these sentences into one sentence?
in the 1720s, colonists who were living in south carolina. petitioned england, they wanted forts built to their south.
colonists living in south carolina in the 1720s petitioned england because they wanted forts built to their south.
in the 1720s, colonists who were living in south carolina petitioned england because they wanted forts built to their south.
in the 1720s, colonists living in south carolina petitioned england to build forts to their south.

The local school board would like to change the school calendar so that students are in school year round. do you think this is a good idea or a bad idea? to you see which side you want to defend answer this question from both angles.

In what ways do “the lamb” and “the tyger” represent opposite sides of human existence? a. “the lamb” urges passive control, while “the tyger” glorifies man’s dominance over nature. b. “the lamb” urges meek acceptance, while “the tyger” glorifies nature and power. c. “the lamb” urges childlike faith, while “the tyger” glorifies man’s experience.

Which statement best evaluates the author's use of pacing in the passage? a. the author's use of pacing is not effective, because the imagery and figurative language don't adequately describe either the cheetah or the gazelle. b. the author's use of pacing is effective, because the imagery and figurative language speed up the action, making the scene come alive for the reader. c. the author's use of pacing is effective, because the long, complex sentences the reader fully understand the power and beauty of nature. d. the author's use of pacing is not effective, because the long, complex sentences distract from the sense of stress and anxiety the passage should convey.