Baseball players should chew tobacco just like runners drink water during long runs. which answer choice best identifies the logical fallacy in the above statement and explains why the conclusion is false? a. hasty generalization: the statement says that all baseball players chew tobacco just like all runners drink water. b. testimonial: a pro-baseball player endorses the use of chewing tobacco while a marathoner endorses bottled water. c. faulty analogy: this statement compares tobacco to water. whereas runners need to drink water during long runs to keep hydrated, which them continue running, baseball players don’t need to chew tobacco to play a game. d. the statement is not a logical fallacy but a valid conclusion.

Our visitors missed blank stop and arrived late

If you were making a persuasive speech about how students should take creative writing every year they are in school, which sentence would most effectively support that argument?

Read the excerpt below from the poem "exile" by julia alvarez and answer the question that follows. i let myself lie back in deep waters, my arms out like jesus' on his cross, and instead of sinking down like i'd always done, magically, that night, i could stay up, floating out past the driveway, past the gates, in the black ford, papi grim at the wheel, winding through the back roads, stroke by difficult stroke, out on the highway, heading toward the coast. which literary device is used in the comparison between the speaker's experience of fleeing the country and floating in the ocean? i let myself lie back in deep waters, my arms out like jesus' on his cross, and instead of sinking down like i'd always done, magically, that night, i could stay up, extended metaphor symbolism simile theme