Compare and contrast the theories of locke and descartes. on what points do these two philosophers agree? on what points do they disagree? pay close attention to their views on how human intellect is acquired. your answer should consist of 100 to 250 words. you must use textual evidence to support your points. be sure to introduce that evidence properly and use quotation marks appropriately. clearly note the author to whom you are referring. hint: you could write one paragraph comparing their theories and then a second paragraph that illustrates their contrasting points of view.

John Locke based some of his ideas on the Rationalism and the Mechanical philosophy, that were two of the disciplines which had a large contribution from Descartes.

Nevertheless, Locke disagress from Descartes in the way humans acquire knowledge, for instance, he believed that analogies and establishing relations was necessary in order to establish critical instruments to filter wrong learning. He was opposed to the mere mechanical and cartesian conceptions which were more related to the Descartes theories.

On contrary to Descartes, whom argued that thare was not innate knowledge and that only the experience should he held into account. Locke disputed the dream argument by Descartes which said that we can feel and experience sensory stimuli even during the dreams.

Explanation:

answer: b. grete might have remained as shy and immature as she was at the beginning of the story.

one of the most interesting characteristics of gregor's metamorphosis is that, although he is the only character who has physically changed, it is this same change which triggered a transformation in the rest of his family.

by taking care of gregor, grete has become stronger and more confident. she has found a life outside of the house, and has become more independent and self-sufficient. the novel implies that the trigger for the change is gregor's own transformation, and that without it, grete was likely to remain as shy and immature as she was at the beginning of the book.

explanation:

i’m writing a memoir and i’ve been given the great suggestion of placing a ‘sub-narrative’ within some of the chapters – sort of, what was going on with me in the grand scheme of things.

i was wondering how to format this so that it is very obvious we are stepping out the of story.

firstly is a change in font from serif to sans workable? i also use dashes for a scene change. was thinking of using a different scene-changer too.

here’s a (shortened) example:

university – or what’s known as ‘uni’ in australia – were some of the best days of my life. where else do you get to potter around in a great location, have very little responsibility, learn lots of things, do lots of things and walk out four years later with a bonus – a degree!

with my university years i had immersed myself into community of intelligent ambitious people. generally everyone had a confidence about themselves. they knew where they were going in life and weren’t threatened by others.

—–

next normal paragraph continues here…

(sorry couldn’t show the fonts in this comment field)

too much?