If you were writing an essay on the use of undercover narcotics officers in high schools to fight the selling and using of illegal drugs, which research source listed below is most likely to be unbiased, accurate, and credible? a) an interview with an undercover narcotics officer who caught several high school students b) an interview with a judge who presided over many cases involving undercover narcotics officer arrests c) an interview with a teenager who was caught selling drugs at school by an undercover narcotics officer d) an interview with a mother who led protests against her son's arrest by an undercover narcotics officer

B) an interview with a judge who presided over many cases involving undercover narcotics officer arrests.

Explanation:

A judge is someone that is often faced with the hard job of sentencing someone and deciding if they are guilty or not, he has to be unbiased and objective when making this decision, and over the course of the years he has seen many cases involving uncercover narcotics officers, this means he has experience and can se both the good and the bad side of the matter because of his years of experience in the matter.

not exaxtly

explanation: it depends on the situation like if u do something good there will be good consequences which arent punishments but if you do somthing bad there will be bad consequences which are punishements.