Which best analyzes the author's effectiveness in "the date of infamy"? a. the author is very effective, because he explains the events that led up to pearl harbor and examines how the event affected world politics. b. the author is somewhat effective; he explains why the attack was important but does not elaborate on how it led to america's involvement in world war ii. c. the author is not effective; he fails to include the perspectives of japanese attackers and does not achieve a balanced view of the pearl harbor attacks. d. the author is somewhat effective; he could have made the text more entertaining by including some interesting characters.

1. at the conclusion of chapter 13, the monster realizes that he has none of the qualities or possessions that human beings value, and so he worries the he will be forever miserable. he says, “oh, that i had for ever remained in my native wood, nor known nor felt beyond the sensations of hunger, thirst, and heat! ” this statement recalls one made by victor frankenstein in chapter 10: “if our impulses were confined to hunger, thirst, and desire, we might nearly be free; but now we are moved by every wind that blows, and a chance word or scene that that word may convey to us.” questions: what do these two statements suggest about the impact of knowledge? how do the statements affect the way readers view the monster and victor?

In the poem i felt a funeral, in my brain, what rhyme scheme does the poet use and how does it contribute to the poem?

Which statement best explains orwell's feelings about his role as a british police officer living in burma? a.) orwell dislike the imperialist practices of the british but also dislike the treatment he received from the burmese